Generate landing page variants that actually convert your ICP. Score each headline, value prop, and CTA against buyer psychology—not gut feel.
You are a conversion copywriter who specializes in {{INDUSTRY}} SaaS. Your job is to generate landing page message variants and score them ruthlessly against a specific buyer profile.
My ideal customer profile:
- Role: {{BUYER_ROLE}}
- Company size: {{COMPANY_SIZE}}
- Primary pain point: {{PAIN_POINT}}
- Success metric they care about: {{SUCCESS_METRIC}}
- Budget authority: {{BUDGET_AUTHORITY}}
- Buying timeline: {{BUYING_TIMELINE}}
My product: {{PRODUCT_NAME}}
What it does: {{PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION}}
Key differentiator: {{DIFFERENTIATOR}}
Current landing page performance:
- Conversion rate: {{CURRENT_CONVERSION_RATE}}
- Traffic source: {{TRAFFIC_SOURCE}}
- Biggest objection (if known): {{BIGGEST_OBJECTION}}
Generate 6 landing page variants. Each variant should include:
1. A headline (8–12 words max)
2. A value prop (one sentence, specific to the pain point)
3. A CTA (action-oriented, not generic)
After generating each variant, score it on:
- Clarity (1–10): Does the buyer immediately understand what this is?
- Specificity (1–10): Does it name the pain point or outcome, not a feature?
- Urgency (1–10): Does it create a reason to act now?
- ICP fit (1–10): How well does it speak to {{BUYER_ROLE}} specifically?
- Confidence (1–10): How likely is this to outperform the current page?
Rank all 6 variants by confidence score. For the top 3, explain in one sentence why they work for your ICP.1. Fill in all {{placeholders}} with your actual ICP data, product details, and current performance metrics. Don't guess—use data from your CRM, sales calls, or recent customer interviews. 2. Run the prompt and get 6 variants ranked by ICP fit. 3. Pick the top 2–3 variants and build them as separate landing pages (or use a tool like Unbounce or Leadpages to A/B test them). 4. Run each variant for at least 100 conversions before declaring a winner. Statistical noise kills bad decisions. 5. Once you have a winner, use the same prompt to generate variants of *that* winner (test new CTAs, new value props, new headlines) and repeat.
INDUSTRY: B2B SaaS (contract management) BUYER_ROLE: General Counsel COMPANY_SIZE: 500–5000 employees PAIN_POINT: Contracts buried in email and shared drives; no audit trail; compliance risk SUCCESS_METRIC: Reduce contract review time by 40%; eliminate lost contracts BUDGET_AUTHORITY: Procurement + Legal sign-off required BUYING_TIMELINE: 90 days PRODUCT_NAME: ContractVault PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION: Centralized contract repository with AI-powered search, version control, and compliance alerts DIFFERENTIATOR: Only solution that integrates with Salesforce and Slack; no data migration required CURRENT_CONVERSION_RATE: 1.8% TRAFFIC_SOURCE: LinkedIn ads targeting General Counsels BIGGEST_OBJECTION: "We already use SharePoint."
VARIANT 1
Headline: Stop losing contracts in email.
Value Prop: ContractVault gives your legal team a single source of truth—with AI-powered search and compliance alerts built in.
CTA: See how in 5 minutes.
Clarity: 9 | Specificity: 9 | Urgency: 6 | ICP fit: 9 | Confidence: 8.5
Why it works: Names the exact pain (lost contracts), speaks to the buyer's role (legal team), and offers a low-friction next step.
VARIANT 2
Headline: Your contracts. Searchable. Compliant. Integrated.
Value Prop: No more contract archaeology. ContractVault syncs with Salesforce and Slack so your team finds what they need in seconds.
CTA: Start a free audit of your contract chaos.
Clarity: 8 | Specificity: 7 | Urgency: 7 | ICP fit: 8 | Confidence: 7.8
Why it works: Speaks to the integration advantage (differentiator) and uses self-deprecating language ("contract archaeology") that resonates with overworked legal teams.
VARIANT 3
Headline: Reduce contract review time by 40%. No migration required.
Value Prop: ContractVault plugs into your existing Salesforce and Slack workflows. Your team gets AI-powered search and compliance alerts on day one.
CTA: Book a 15-minute walkthrough.
Clarity: 9 | Specificity: 10 | Urgency: 8 | ICP fit: 9.5 | Confidence: 9.2
Why it works: Leads with the outcome (40% faster reviews), removes the biggest objection (no migration), and names the integration advantage. Highest ICP fit because it speaks directly to the General Counsel's KPIs.
VARIANT 4
Headline: SharePoint isn't a contract management system.
Value Prop: ContractVault is. With version control, audit trails, and AI search—so your legal team spends time on strategy, not archaeology.
CTA: See the difference.
Clarity: 8 | Specificity: 8 | Urgency: 5 | ICP fit: 7 | Confidence: 6.9
Why it works: Directly addresses the biggest objection but risks sounding defensive. Better for retargeting than cold traffic.
VARIANT 5
Headline: Compliance risk lives in your email.
Value Prop: ContractVault moves it to a searchable, auditable system. Integrates with Salesforce and Slack in one day.
CTA: Eliminate contract risk.
Clarity: 9 | Specificity: 9 | Urgency: 9 | ICP fit: 8.5 | Confidence: 8.8
Why it works: Opens with fear (compliance risk), offers relief (searchable system), and proves speed (one day). Strong for risk-averse buyers like General Counsels.
VARIANT 6
Headline: The contract management system your legal team actually wants to use.
Value Prop: No data migration. Works with Salesforce and Slack. AI-powered search that actually works.
CTA: Try it free for 14 days.
Clarity: 7 | Specificity: 6 | Urgency: 4 | ICP fit: 6 | Confidence: 5.2
Why it works: Soft and approachable but lacks specificity and urgency. Better for warm traffic (existing leads) than cold.
TOP 3 RANKED BY CONFIDENCE:
1. Variant 3 (9.2): Outcome-first, removes friction, speaks to the buyer's KPIs.
2. Variant 5 (8.8): Fear + relief + speed. Works for risk-averse legal buyers.
3. Variant 1 (8.5): Simple, specific, low-friction next step.