Compare
Editorial comparison for operators. Ratings are sample data unless verified.
This comparison puts Microsoft Teams side by side for operators evaluating them in 2026 — pricing model, free access, API availability, and editorial fit. Both compete in Communication & Collaboration, so the decision usually comes down to pricing model, integrations, and how each fits an existing workflow. Treat ratings and pricing as directional and confirm current details on each vendor's site before committing.
| Attribute | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|
| Type | tool |
| Summary | Teams is where Microsoft 365 orgs stop context-switching. Chat, calls, files, and workflows live in one place—if you're already paying for Office, you're already paying for this. |
| Pricing | freemium · See vendor site |
| Free trial | No / not listed |
| API | Yes |
| Open source | No |
| Editor rating | — |
| Categories | Communication & Collaboration, Team Chat, Video Conferencing |
| Key features | Channel-based conversations organized by team, project, or topic with threaded replies and persistent history. · Direct and group messaging with read receipts, typing indicators, and search across all conversations. · Video and audio conferencing with screen sharing, recording, and meeting transcription (Teams Premium). · File collaboration via SharePoint and OneDrive integration—upload, version, and co-edit without leaving Teams. · Power Automate and bot integration for workflow automation, approvals, and notification aggregation. |
| Actions |
Select up to 4 items
Pick at least two tools or software products to compare.